SPS Council 2007

 

Committee D: Ethics Recommendations from 2004 Congress

Page history last edited by gary white 2 yrs ago

 

Committee D: Ethics Recommendations from 2004 Congress

 

Committee charge

 

Committee D is charged with

1) reviewing the progress wrt the recommendations, and

2) identifying any other actions wrt the Recommendations that should be pushed forward, and 

3) developing a plan to implement the highest priority items, and

4) planning for a way to represent the progress on the recommendations at the 2008 Congress.

 

Committee members

 

CHAIR: William DeGraffenreid (Zone 18), degraff@csus.edu

Phillip Anz-Meador (Zone 16), anzmefda@erau.edu

Zeb Graham (Zone 15), zcgraham@gmail.com

Martin Kamela (Zone 5), mkamela@elon.edu

Lee Sawyer (Zone 10), sawyer@phys.latech.edu

Alexander Sell (Zone 5), sellco2000@yahoo.com

 

Background Information

 

SPS 2004 Congress Ethics Recommendations:

1) Sigma Pi Sigma/SPS should issue a resolution stating that ethics education be integrated into the physics program. 

2) Sigma Pi Sigma/SPS should create/disseminate a set of ethics resources including curricula, case studies, speaker lists. 

3) Sigma Pi Sigma/SPS should expand its efforts to involve alumni and industry in its initiatives to promote career diversity. 

4) Sigma Pi Sigma/SPS should assign a committee to investigate existing professional society and publisher statements and guidelines regarding ethics, with an eye to endorsing these or modifying them for our use. 

5) Sigma Pi Sigma/SPS publications should have ethics-based guidelines, including those that recognize students’ roles in publications. 

6) As an honor society, Sigma Pi Sigma/SPS should have a disciplinary procedure for those who violate the standards of the society.

7) Sigma Pi Sigma/SPS should issue a statement on the importance of achieving diversity in physics. 

8) Sigma Pi Sigma/SPS should expand its general portfolio of programs and resources to include those targeted at groups under-represented in physics.

9) Sigma Pi Sigma/SPS should issue a statement recommending that the tenure and post-tenure review process consider more strongly the tenure candidate’s impact on student development. 

10) Sigma Pi Sigma/SPS should issue a request to chapters that chapters educate and inform students about the tenure process that physics faculty undergo. 

 

links and references

Professionalism and Ethics Resources

SPS Statement on Engaging Students in Issues of Professional Conduct

notes from Ethics Recommendations Committee meeting 9/28/07

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.